Sounds to me that you have the perfect opportunity to
make a major point if you reply to that NPRM - chaos
will rule without active enforcement (just like on CB and FRS).
In the NPRM they want to drop all licensing - even license-by rule.
And we have seen just how well license-by-rule works on FRS.
One of the major points I am making is that there is no
visible enforcement effort on GMRS and there needs to be.
At 01:25 PM 07/06/10, you wrote:
From real lfe experience, Does it really make a difference what
rules are promulgated? GMRS in NY is nothing but a waste of
spectrum. Foul mouthed, profane, and down right illegal use is the
norm now. Add to that, groups that "own" their channel with the
apparent blessing of the FCC who will not do anything to stop these practices.
Make them all bubble pak radios, it will not matter one bit.
Lance /N2HBA
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:[email protected]>corwinmoore
To: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 7:58 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: More on GMRS - Fwd: FCC NPRM
proposes complete part 95 rewrite
--- In
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected],
"George Henry" <ka3...@...> wrote:
>
> The comment period for the NPRM ends July 7. ...
The 30-day period for public cmment on this important FCC proposal
will begin on the date of publication in the Federal Register. That
has not yet happened. (We expect it any day now.)
For more definitive information (including the issues involved, and
the confusion surrounding the licensing fees and term), go to:
<http://www.provide.net/~prsg>http://www.provide.net/~prsg
- Corwin Moore (PRSG Administrative Coordinator)
