Yes it is.  

 

Care to describe your setup?

 

73,

 

Mike

WM4B

ARRL O-O

 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of JOHN MACKEY
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line

 

  

For about 10 years I have been controlling my repeater using an internet
connection. The repeater is 1900 miles away from me. Wireline control is
legal for amateur radio!

------ Original Message ------
Received: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:31:52 PM PDT
From: "Mike Besemer \(WM4B\)" <[email protected]
<mailto:mwbesemer%40cox.net> >
To: <[email protected]
<mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> >
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line

> At our club meeting tonight a discussion came up regarding the cost of the
> phone line to our 2-meter repeater system. Originally it was there for the
> Autopatch, but has evolved to being primarily used for me to program the
> controller (CAT-1000) and to control the system. (The autopatch is rarely
> used, since everyone carries a cellphone now.) 
> 
> 
> 
> Everyone understands that the phone line is needed for control and
> programming, but we started toying with other ideas. Specifically, having
> an Internet connection at the site seemed like it had a lot of potential,
> but frankly I don't know why! It'd be nice to run an I-Gate from that
> location (we already have an APRS weather node there), but it's not
> essential. I could probably use it to monitor the site as well, but that's
> not really much of a concern either.
> 
> 
> 
> So, the question is, how can we use Internet to control/program the
> CAT-1000? We could get Internet at the site for about the same cost as the
> phone, and if we could use it for repeater control/programming AND the
other
> things I mentioned, it'd be a better deal. 
> 
> 
> 
> Can IRLP be used for control/programming? I'm not familiar with that
system
> whatsoever, but am always willing to learn.
> 
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> WM4B
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to