Ross, Yes, I used the WB2WHC voter board back in the 90's. It does not really go to three ports easily, but you can use three boards to make a four channel voter. It's like a pyramid, chan 1 and 2 gets voted by the first board, chan 3 and 4 by a second, then the output of each of those go into a third board. It works really well, especially for the cost.
Dwayne Kincaid WD8OYG --- In [email protected], "Ross Johnson" <kc7...@...> wrote: > > I'm in the exact same boat working on a remote receiver. I don't want > the link keyed 24-7 either. I now there are some voters out there that > don't require 1950hz and some that don't need it present 100% of the > time to keep that voter port active. But are there any other voters in > the used or DIY market that's in the HAM budget. That do not require the > 1950hz tone at all. Here one I found on RB but I will need eventually 3 > ports. http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/wb2whc.html Can one more > port be added and has anyone had good success with this unit? > > Thanks All, > Ross kc7rjk > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim - WD6AWP > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 3:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Recommendations for a Voter Link > > > I'm going to start working on building a link for a remote receiver. I > already have a voter and I'll be using a VHF Micor receiver strip for > the remote. > > A couple of mobiles that tune down to 420 might be good as I don't have > a lot room. I'm thinking the link transmitter will be keyed 7x24 with > tone signaling. However the duty cycle requirement is a problem for > mobiles. A microwave system might be possible if I knew what and where > to get. Wireline is probably out. > > I'd like to hear your ideas on how to put this together. > > Thanks, > Tim > > P.S. Sorry if this post is a dup. The first one did seem to come through > this morning. >
