> > I wasn't meaning a Pi based phone, I just noticed that a lot of > these (albeit not the Pi, I know the Android struggles there) support > Android and use a lot of open components. I don't think Replicant on > CuBox(I) or PandaBoard > > Well, the GTA04 Replicant 4.2 image [1] should already be able to run > on a PandaBoard if combined with a boot loader on some SD card. And if > the kernel is configured correctly.
Unlike on GNU/Linux systems, it is a bad idea to expect binary compatibility on Android. So many things are defined at build time that it is unlikely that everything will work as expected, unless components were designed with that aim in mind (which is what I'll be trying to achieve for Allwinner tablets: one image for all the tablets). The kernel wouldn't work either, as we don't use device tree on Android yet. > Unfortunately my PandaBoard ES is currently needed for something > different so I can't initiate a test. As far as I know, the PandaBoards run OMAP4 SoCs, while the GTA04 is a DM3730 (OMAP3) device. That said, our Replicant image for the GTA04 doesn't really have any OMAP3-specific component (yet). Hence a major problem with the kernel. I think AOSP has native PandaBoard (and maybe BeagleBoard, too), so it would be dead easy to try to build such an image of Replicant. -- Paul Kocialkowski, Replicant developer Replicant is a fully free Android distribution Website: http://www.replicant.us/ Redmine: http://redmine.replicant.us/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant
