El 10 de noviembre de 2015 14:16:45 GMT+00:00, Tyler <ty...@hack.ink> escribió: >On 11/09/15, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: >> What is your opinion on SMSSecure (Send encrypted text messages >(SMS)) - https://f-droid.org/app/org.smssecure.smssecure their web page >says that they are using the same Protocol, I is just a little bit less >user friendly because of the not automatic key exchange at the >begining? > >In the beginning, when dinosaurs roamed the land, TextSecure only >supported sending encrypted SMS. That functionality is what later >became >SMSSecure. This was the original version 1 of the TextSecure protocol. > >Then they added the ability to send messages via GSM/WiFi, and changed >the TS protocol to version 2. At some point Moxie decided to drop SMS >support. This pissed off various people who were clinging to SMS, so >the >forked, ripped out the SMS code and have been maintaining/developing on >it ever since. > >I have never used SMSSecure. I presume that it probably works on >Replicant. I prefer TextSecure, now Signal because I have many friends >in different countries, and so the ability to message people via WiFi >as >opposed to SMS is non-negotiable to me. > Works on out of the box Android as well, thanks for your information!
>On 11/09/15, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> > >> Having a centralized server infrastructure can be a > >> security/privacy/foss concern as well. Are there any free software > >> Signal servers out there? If one person has the ability to ban > >> arbitrary people from the network, that raise a red flag to me. > >> > >> /Simon > >@janimo (Works for Canonical, develops TS-QML + the TS Go Library) has >a >TS Server Docker container you might be interested in if you desire to >look into such things: >https://github.com/janimo/textsecure-docker > > > > > >Re: The whole federating TS and making a free software server to >federate with upstream: I don't see a need for it. If you want extra >security/privacy/whatever, run your own server, hand compile apks, and >hand them out to your friends to use with your server. It's moxie's >server, he's paying monthly for an ISP/datacenter/whatever. Absolutely >it's his right to ban whoever he wants off his server - he's paying >rent. You don't like it, spin up your own. > >This whole thing about walled gardens - hello, the server source is >openly published. What is a real problem is that the RedPhone server >source is hidden. They should have released source for that too. -- RichmondMakerlabs.uk Ham United Group _______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list Replicant@lists.osuosl.org http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant
