On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:00:33 +0100 Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think we should be talking about TrustZone here in particular > bur rather talk about privileged execution environments in general. We > could rephrase it like this: > > " This is even more problematic when the bootloader is in charge of > loading the privileged execution environment, such as TrustZone, as > that code gives full control of the processor to software that is > proprietary and cannot be modified." Here I fully agree with the "execution environment" change. > Note that if the code cannot be modified, it is proprietary per-se. For the end user, yes, which is what I care about. However I prefer and/or as it puts all the bad combination (proprietary, freely licensed and signed, proprietary and signed) on the same level, as the result is the same for the end user. Denis.
pgpAvl9HOYxwO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant
