On Sun, 02 Sep 2018 18:15:00 +0000 Joonas Kylmälä <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can test it and push after the upstream merges. All the (non-merge) > commits to this point have contained the Signed-off-by line Thanks for spotting that. It's important to have Signed-off-by to be able to send patches upstream: Some projects like Linux will refuse patches that do not have the signed-off-by. > but it seems like Replicant project has not formally established a > meaning for it? I guess that most/all projects follow Linux's meaning[1]. It is also nice that the documentation on Signed-off-by[1] has been updated to clarify the cases where you have to modify the code of other people (I always wondered how to deal with that before). Reference: ---------- [1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v4.18#n415 Denis.
pgpqmaMPZWrFc.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant
