Thanks for looking into it Denis. I hope you can find the time to review all the rest, there's surely much more to fix.
On 06/12/2019 21:58, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: >> Tor Browser: > We'd need to look if it's FSDG compliant. If not the best way to make > it FSDG compliant would be to make upstream not use to an > add-on/extension repository with nonfree software in it. Damn, you are right, it isn't. It allows the installation of addons directly from addons.mozilla.org . Since the Tor people are so vocal on warning users not to change the configurations (because that changes the browser fingerprint), I thought they had disabled the addons, but it seems they didn't. Well, I am adding an asterisk to it, just as in F-Droid. > Here's a phone that would respect your freedom. > The issue is the term phone here. > Assuming an unlikely future where the modem firmware is fully > free Hmm… got your point. But I would rather keep it as a phone with an added note about an hypothetical network that does not track users. In the other flyers (ugly and bad) we mention the modem quite a lot. Comparing, apples to apples, i.e. phones to phones, in all 3 flyers makes it easier for people to grasp the concepts. As you did for WiFi, I can also imagine a cellular network that doesn't track users. It's hard but possible, the people at CCC have the beginnings of it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant
