i could offer suggestion for re-wording; but im still not totally clear of the intention of A3 - i am trying to discern between these cases:
// the strict interpretation of the current wording: - <li id="A3"><p>Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option. + <li id="A3"><p>Offers an AGPLv3 license file as a standard option. // my current interpretation, based on the feedback, thus far: - <li id="A3"><p>Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option. + <li id="A3"><p>Explains the AGPL 3-or-later option. // but, why specify only the 'AGPL'? // the -or-later option can be applied to the GPLv2 and v3 also: - <li id="A3"><p>Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option. + <li id="A3"><p>Explains the GPL and AGPL '-or-later' option. // or, to add that implementation instructions should be given: - <li id="A3"><p>Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option. + <li id="A3"><p>Explains the GPL and AGPL '-or-later' option, + and how to apply it.
