[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> that touches on another point, which i did not mention (because > it is a weak one) - in terms of practicality, the criteria > _effectively_ is: "insists on the GPL"; because, in practice, > 99% of code under permissive licenses does not identify the > license of each file I disagree with that step of reasoning. It's not a lot of work to add license notices to a work under a weak license. This feature would warn the developers, and if they did not want to get the warnings again, they could add appropriate notices to the files. It's like satisfying a compiler warning. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
