FYI. I told Gary I didn't personally have a problem with his request, but that I'd pass it along to the maintainers group.
Chris ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gary Kramlich <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:35 PM Subject: reportbug name usage To: [email protected] Hi Chris, I hope I'm not intruding, but I'm in the scoping phase of a new library that I plan to integrate the action of reporting bugs in applications in an abstract way. The idea is very similar to reportbug, but the idea is to do it in an distribution/OS abstracted way. Anyways, the real purpose of this email is about the name reportbug. Right now, I'd leaning towards "libreportbug", but I wanted to get your approval before I go ahead and use it. If you say no, I understand. The last thing I want to do is add potential confusion on which package does what. And to me a name is a name, libreportbug just seems to describe it very well. Anyways, thanks for your time, -- Gary Kramlich <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklDLYIACgkQdf4lmqisgDKV0wCcDuzoh7EMhzoQoFWEIDFOYZ1L U98AoJA6bKGniR/frWtn6nTCUcLFKn8x =QFqJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Reportbug-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
