Hello Gary, I don't have problems me either about the lib name, what I can only suggest is to clearly state in the description that "libreportbug" is in no way related with "reportbug", but it's a lib to enable bug reporting in apps.
Regards, Sandro On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:39, Chris Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI. I told Gary I didn't personally have a problem with his request, > but that I'd pass it along to the maintainers group. > > > Chris > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Gary Kramlich <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:35 PM > Subject: reportbug name usage > To: [email protected] > > > Hi Chris, > > I hope I'm not intruding, but I'm in the scoping phase of a new library > that I plan to integrate the action of reporting bugs in applications in > an abstract way. The idea is very similar to reportbug, but the idea is > to do it in an distribution/OS abstracted way. > > Anyways, the real purpose of this email is about the name reportbug. > Right now, I'd leaning towards "libreportbug", but I wanted to get your > approval before I go ahead and use it. > > If you say no, I understand. The last thing I want to do is add > potential confusion on which package does what. And to me a name is a > name, libreportbug just seems to describe it very well. > > Anyways, thanks for your time, > > -- > Gary Kramlich <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Reportbug-maint mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint > > -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi _______________________________________________ Reportbug-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
