Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:07:39 +0800
with message-id <1298696859.11372.46.camel@chianamo>
and subject line Re: Bug#611600: reportbug: don't report
debconf/depends/recommends/suggests info when there is none
has caused the Debian Bug report #611600,
regarding reportbug: don't report debconf/depends/recommends/suggests info when
there is none
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
611600: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611600
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.12.6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Please add the attached two patches, which slightly reduce unneeded
clutter in bug reports.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
From 1d5c82355f1367c5a63fc954708b025898257479 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Wise <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:14:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Don't report Depends/Recommends/Suggests if there are none.
---
reportbug/utils.py | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/reportbug/utils.py b/reportbug/utils.py
index cb64de7..1f16ab9 100644
--- a/reportbug/utils.py
+++ b/reportbug/utils.py
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ def packages_providing(package):
def get_dependency_info(package, depends, rel="depends on"):
if not depends:
- return ('\n%s %s no packages.\n' % (package, rel))
+ return ''
dependencies = []
for dep in depends:
--
1.7.2.3
From caf3c942731f0f0a05eb5a90cc9253d43d4a5984 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Wise <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:22:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Don't report debconf information if there is none.
---
bin/reportbug | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/reportbug b/bin/reportbug
index b659b23..769e60b 100755
--- a/bin/reportbug
+++ b/bin/reportbug
@@ -1782,8 +1782,6 @@ For more details, please see: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/''')
conftext += u'\n-- debconf information:\n%s\n' % output
else:
conftext += u'\n-- debconf information excluded\n'
- else:
- conftext += u'\n-- no debconf information\n'
ewrite('\n')
prompted = False
--
1.7.2.3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:30 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Mh honestly I don't feel it's worth it :)
Ok, lets close this bug.
I'll purge reportbug from my systems and either switch to reportbug-ng
or fork reportbug for my personal use.
> Probably I'm not completely getting your reason behind this request:
> does those few lines bother you so much? or it's just a way to reduce
> (nearly empty) information in reports? I like more consistency than
> minimalism :)
I can't see any reason to include them and I generally like to get rid
of useless cruft. I had intended to submit more patches for other such
stuff, but you clearly aren't interested in that, sorry for the noise.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Reportbug-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
