Chris McDonough wrote: > On 5/9/09 9:12 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: >> It'd be nice if there was a way to name the files that meant people >> won't accidentally commit a bunch of "compiled" .py files that may then >> end up conflicting later. > > Maybe there could be a mode to compile template files directly to .pyc for > folks > that wanted it. But if it complicated Chameleon at all to do so, I'd much > rather say to those people "don't check in .pt.py files" than have 500 lines > of > source to enforce it.
The pyc files are dependent on a number of Python settings, the Python version being one of them. I'd rather have the py files generated, so I can also generate those up front on my machine and actually ship all of them inside a distribution. The specific Python interpreter on the target machine can handle py to pyc/pyo compilation just fine. Only having pyc files is also a pain with zope.testing and its eager cleanup mode, which would constantly delete these files. Hanno _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
