2009/6/3 Chris Rossi <ch...@archimedeanco.com>:
> Just read over the repoze.curry docs--looks really cool!
> I was glad to see at the end that you had a "static" decorator on the to-do
> list. I had thought of that while reading your docs and was going to
> suggest it anyway. I was wondering, though, if "const" might be a better
> name for it. Marking a function as "const" would be morally equivalent to a
> C++ function with all of its arguments declared const. (key difference, of
> course, that C++ compiler actually enforces this.) static generally implies
> something different in most languages that use it.
You may be right; ``const`` could be a better term. I'm not too much
into the lingo of computer languages at large.
Repoze-dev mailing list