Malthe Borch wrote:
> 2009/10/22 Chris McDonough <>:
>> Do we just need to change the path matching syntax instead to get your
>> *.html case to work?  Is there another case for predicates?
> I think that in general, predicates make sense without the view on
> <route>s. Is there anything in the way of letting them act upon
> ``route.match`` instead of ``view.predicate_checker``?

I don't think there's anything in particular in the way.  I'd like to have some 
concrete use cases before we add the code, because it could be difficult to 

- C

Repoze-dev mailing list

Reply via email to