Malthe Borch wrote: > 2009/10/22 Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com>: >> Do we just need to change the path matching syntax instead to get your >> *.html case to work? Is there another case for predicates? > > I think that in general, predicates make sense without the view on > <route>s. Is there anything in the way of letting them act upon > ``route.match`` instead of ``view.predicate_checker``?
I don't think there's anything in particular in the way. I'd like to have some concrete use cases before we add the code, because it could be difficult to document. - C _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repozeemail@example.com http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev