Ricardo Mendes wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've found minor errors in the following pages
> 
> URL dispatch, page 66
> -  foo/abc/def -> {’baz’:u’abc’, ’bar’:u’*2*’}
> + foo/abc/def -> {’baz’:u’abc’, ’bar’:u’*def*’}
> 
> URL dispatch, page 67
> -  foo/abc/def/a/b/c -> {’baz’:abc, ’bar’:*2*, ’traverse’:(’a’, ’b’, ’c’)}
> + foo/abc/def/a/b/c -> {’baz’:abc, ’bar’:*def*, ’traverse’:(’a’, ’b’, ’c’)}
> 
> peace,
> Ricardo Mendes

Thank you!  Fixed in SVN...

- C


> 
> 2009/12/27 Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com <mailto:chr...@plope.com>>
> 
>     The most recent release (1.2a9) of repoze.bfg contains a documentation
>     licensing modification.
> 
>     Previous releases of the documentation stated no explicit license.
>      The most
>     recent release of repoze.bfg asserts that the documentation has the
>     Creative
>     Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United
>     States License
>     as described by http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ .
> 
>     This licensing modification has no impact on the BFG *software*
>     itself; the
>     software continues to be offered under the BSD-like "Repoze Public
>     License" at
>     http://repoze.org/license.html .
> 
>     Why the change?  Mostly it's because I'm going to publish the
>     documentation in
>     dead-tree form, and the CC license is a friendlier license for this
>     task.
> 
>     I've prepared a PDF of the documentation from the latest release
>     BFG, which is
>     roughly what will be available in dead-tree form at
>     http://static.repoze.org/bfg-1.2a9.pdf .
> 
>     It would be extremely useful to have some technical review of the
>     PDF before I
>     create the first publishing batch.  Technical review consists of
>     reading and
>     reviewing the entire PDF and providing feedback in email form on
>     comprehensibility, sentence structure, omissions, errors, and rendering
>     improvement suggestions.  If anyone would be willing to volunteer
>     for such a
>     task, I'd be happy to send them a copy of the first printed book
>     edition.
> 
>     - C
>     _______________________________________________
>     Repoze-dev mailing list
>     Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org <mailto:Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org>
>     http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Repoze-dev mailing list
> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

_______________________________________________
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Reply via email to