Chris McDonough wrote: > Here's the set of commands that get run to test e.g. repoze.bfg: > > /opt/Python-2.6.4/bin/virtualenv --no-site-packages r$SVN_REVISION/ > > r$SVN_REVISION/bin/easy_install nose coverage nosexcover
No sex cover, ey? That sounds like an STD risk. > cd repoze.bfg-trunk > > ../r$SVN_REVISION/bin/python setup.py develop > > ../r$SVN_REVISION/bin/python setup.py nosetests --with-xunit \ > --with-xcoverage Cool. I guess there's a standard there somewhere that both Cobertura and nose adheres to. I wonder how hard it is to run Zope/Plone tests through nose in this way. I'm guessing quite. >> - How did you get Cobertura integration going? I've been using >> z3c.coverage + the NCover plugin, but yours looks nicer. > > Vis nosexcover and using nose to run the tests (that's the --with-xunit and > --with-xcoverage hair), then choosing "Publish Cobertura Coverage Report" in > the configuration. Yeah, makes sense. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
