-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/02/2011 09:33 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:

> I see that there's a 1.x and 2.x line of repoze.who (2.x being in
> alpha), but I can't seem to figure out what the main differenences are,

The major effort for 2.0 was to factor out the plugin set into an API
object which could be used from within your application, as well as
supporting the "middleware" case.  See:

http://docs.repoze.org/who/2.0/narr.html#using-repoze-who-without-wsgi-middleware

http://docs.repoze.org/who/2.0/api.html#using-repoze-who-without-middleware

http://docs.repoze.org/who/2.0/api.html#mixed-use-of-repoze-who-middleware-and-api

> which version is recommended for general consumption, what the plans for
> finalizing 2.x are (and whether there's something the general public can
> do to help).

The reason we aren't in beta yet is that we may still discover a missing
feature while implementing apps against it.  Testing 2.0 in a wider
range of apps is the biggest help you can provide.

> Humm, I noticed that in Pyramid there is a RepozeWho1AuthenticationPolicy
> -- is that a recommendation to stick with 1.x for now? ;-)

Nope.  The 2.0 version is actually quite stable.  Because the auth
policy for 1.0 didn't require any install_requires dependency on
repoze.who, it shipped with pyramid.  The equivalent version for 2.0
*does* require repoze.who, and thus is factored into a separate pacakge:

  http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyramid_who


Tres.
- -- 
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1JhsgACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6BTgCeNjit7FE+J5YYTrQ0eTeNGm7e
ajEAoKwIKmPJTFXK9oS/FMJkCzYGjkNw
=Tmre
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Reply via email to