* Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> [2011-02-02 17:31]: >> which version is recommended for general consumption, what the plans for >> finalizing 2.x are (and whether there's something the general public can >> do to help). > > The reason we aren't in beta yet is that we may still discover a missing > feature while implementing apps against it. Testing 2.0 in a wider > range of apps is the biggest help you can provide. > >> Humm, I noticed that in Pyramid there is a RepozeWho1AuthenticationPolicy >> -- is that a recommendation to stick with 1.x for now? ;-) > > Nope. The 2.0 version is actually quite stable. Because the auth > policy for 1.0 didn't require any install_requires dependency on > repoze.who, it shipped with pyramid. The equivalent version for 2.0 > *does* require repoze.who, and thus is factored into a separate pacakge: > > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyramid_who
Thanks for the pointer! I guess we'll give 2.0 a whirl, then. Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
