----- Forwarded message from Agustin Martin <[email protected]> -----
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:51:56 +0200 From: Agustin Martin <[email protected]> To: "Chris West (Faux)" <[email protected]>, Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> Subject: Debian reproducibility of some aspell dictionary packages User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Hi, Just to let you know some info that may be useful to track some non reproducibilities in packages creating aspell dictionaries with non-reproducible .cwl files. Do not know if there is a list about this, feel free to share the info there if you consider it convenient. After your recent bug reports against some of my packages related to FTBFS because of locale problems, #789098: br.ispell #789099: eo-spell and the one not yet filed for espa-nol, I noticed that other of my aspell dictionary packages were tagged as non reproducible because of differences in the cwl file, although not showing FTBFS. ispell-fo ispell-gl myspell-pt-br myspell.pt softcatala-spell xuxen-eu-spell I uploaded new packages containing the same change as for those showing FTBFS, in debian/rules, # Make sure build is always done in a reproducible and working # language environment LC_ALL = C export LC_ALL and they seem to be reproducible now, seems that prezip is locale dependent. Regards, -- Agustin ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
