On Fri 2016-09-09 01:33:00 +0200, HW42 wrote: > According to codesearch.d.n it seems only SOURCE_DIR_ROOT isn't taken > yet. (Google finds at least one case).
thanks for looking, that's what i should have done in the first place. > also bikeshedding: I dislike SOURCE_DIR_ROOT because the name is some > how redundant. What's the difference between SOURCE_DIR and > SOURCE_DIR_ROOT? But I don't care much about the naming. if i've got some source with code in three directories, they're all SOURCE_DIRs, but only the top level is SOURCE_DIR_ROOT. > Btw: Do you know why currently debug-prefix-map maps the source dir to > '.'? (My guess is because that's the easiest in dpkg-buildflags) I think > for debugging between package boundaries '${srcpkg}-${srcver}' would be > much better. I guess i don't have much of an opinion either way here, as long as it only adds noise to the -dbgsym packages. --dkg _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds