Holger Levsen: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:44:00PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote: >> I do think it's OK to try to support diffoscope 67 for 2 years because it's >> been quite well tested. > > well, yes… but… > >> I understand that 77 fixes quite a lot of bugs over 67… > > 77 *exists* and is quite probably a lot better than 67, so I now think we > should strive for 77 (or 77++ if needed) in stretch… I like 77, I just don't > like the way we got there. But now that we have it, no need to hide it. >
I understand. Yeah, we don't need to change that. I was just voicing my opinion on "the way we got there" as well. X -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds