On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 01:18:23PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > +Packages are encouraged to produce bit-for-bit identical binary packages 
> > even
> > +if most environment variables and build paths are varied. This is 
> > technically
> > +more difficult at the time of writing, but it is intended that this 
> > stricter
> > +definition would replace the above one, when appropriate in the future.
> > If this type of "intent" wording is not appropriate for Policy then
> > disregard what I'm saying, I don't wish to block this patch for this
> > reason.
> Oh, that's a good way to capture that.  This seems fine to me, and I have
> no objections to adding this advice.  Seconded the original with or
> without this addition.
I'm also seconding the original with or without this addition.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to