On Wed 2017-08-16 15:40:00 +0000, Ximin Luo wrote: > This idea is similar to hardening-wrapper. That is now deprecated, but > was useful as a stepping-stone to more "proper" fixes. Likewise, this > shouldn't be thought of as "the proper fix", but will give us some > useful data on how many packages are affected by which combinations of > (a), (b), (c) or (d). Depending on the number of packages we will have > to patch (with that 2-line patch), it will maybe give weight to future > attempts to have GCC support this env var - and then it would be easy, > since the core functionality would already be in there - or else > highlight the issue so that maintainers of those packages fix things > "properly".
This sounds like a frustrating situation, Ximin, but i think your proposal is a good path forward. Thanks for sticking with it. --dkg _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds