Hi Holger et. al., > > This idea is similar to hardening-wrapper. That is now deprecated, but was > > useful as a stepping-stone to more "proper" fixes. Likewise, this shouldn't > > be thought of as "the proper fix", [...] > > when reading this at first, I didnt like the idea of working it around as you > described
Same.. :( > […] but then you have a valid point with hardening-wrapper Hm, I'm not entirely convinced. Whilst h-w *did* exist, it not only stuck around far too long, I fear that a parallel reproducibile-wrapper will stick around even longer and be even harder still to eventually deprecate as it will be used a lot more due to Policy pushes and/or general buzz around getting one's packages reproducible. It's also — and this should go without saying — unspeakably ugly! Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds