On 12/16/09 11:30 AM, Fred Thornborrow wrote:
> Please close this request.

Done

> 
> The bug was updated with this update in Oct 2009:-
> 
> 
> 
> Subject:
> [Star-developers] Discussing and defining future star enhancements
> From:
> Fred Thornborrow <fred.thornborrow at sun.com>
> Date:
> Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:30:41 -0700
> To:
> star-developers at lists.berlios.de
> CC:
> Bonnie Corwin <Bonnie.Corwin at Sun.COM>
> 
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> I've been asked to review the request to integrate STAR into SFW.
> 
> I manage the consolidation and requests come into the consolidation
> across the company but I don't own each component.
> 
> I see that there is over 5 years of history with this request including
> an ARC case 2004/480.
> 
> Firstly I want to just clarify the current situation as the previous 
> engineer
> working on this request has since left the company.
> 
> Firstly are the tasks to be done the same:-
> 
> # Add star* to /usr/sfw/bin
> # Replace /etc/rmt with rmt from star
> # Add librmt to /usr/sfw/lib
> # Modify ufsdump/ufsrestore to use librmt
> 
> 
> Once I have a good understanding of the amount of work
> involved and across which consolidations then I'll be able
> to evaluate if this project is worth progressing.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Fred Thornborrow
> 
> 
> I've yet to get a response.
> 
> With the recent re-org and Oracle transition and the unknown commitment
> to OpenSolaris I suggest that this bug be closed again. If there is any
> interest within Sun or Oracle of using STAR then this bug could be reopened
> and re-evaluated again.
> *** (#4 of 4): 2009-11-25 09:43:38 PST fred.thornborrow at sun.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> request-sponsor mailing list
> request-sponsor at opensolaris.org

Reply via email to