Ah, got it.
Thanks

The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
-William Gibson


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Scott Ferguson <f...@caucho.com> wrote:

>
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Vinny wrote:
>
> Hello All,
> Still working on my Apache/Resin issues and looking through the docs I
> found :
>
> http://caucho.com/resin-3.1/doc/install-apache.xtp#Configuring%20resin.conf
>
> In the wild I have seen both this:
>
>  <cluster>
>       *<srun server-id="" host="127.0.0.1" port="6802"/>*
>     </cluster>
>
> and this:
>
>  <!-- define the servers in the cluster -->
> <server id="" address="127.0.0.1" port="6802"/>
>
> which one is correct when using mod_caucho but not using a cluster?
>
>
> They're equivalent.  The first one is the old, Resin 3.0 syntax for
> backward compatibility.
>
> In Resin 3.1, every server belongs to a cluster because we want one unified
> deployment model, not a bunch of different cases.  If you have a single
> server, it belongs to a cluster with one server.  In previous versions,
> clustering was a feature, but now it's part of the architecture.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> Tnanks
>
>
>
>
>
> The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
> -William Gibson
> _______________________________________________
> resin-interest mailing list
> resin-interest@caucho.com
> http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resin-interest mailing list
> resin-interest@caucho.com
> http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
>
>
_______________________________________________
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest

Reply via email to