Ah, got it. Thanks
The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. -William Gibson On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Scott Ferguson <f...@caucho.com> wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Vinny wrote: > > Hello All, > Still working on my Apache/Resin issues and looking through the docs I > found : > > http://caucho.com/resin-3.1/doc/install-apache.xtp#Configuring%20resin.conf > > In the wild I have seen both this: > > <cluster> > *<srun server-id="" host="127.0.0.1" port="6802"/>* > </cluster> > > and this: > > <!-- define the servers in the cluster --> > <server id="" address="127.0.0.1" port="6802"/> > > which one is correct when using mod_caucho but not using a cluster? > > > They're equivalent. The first one is the old, Resin 3.0 syntax for > backward compatibility. > > In Resin 3.1, every server belongs to a cluster because we want one unified > deployment model, not a bunch of different cases. If you have a single > server, it belongs to a cluster with one server. In previous versions, > clustering was a feature, but now it's part of the architecture. > > -- Scott > > > > Tnanks > > > > > > The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. > -William Gibson > _______________________________________________ > resin-interest mailing list > resin-interest@caucho.com > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest > > > > _______________________________________________ > resin-interest mailing list > resin-interest@caucho.com > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest > >
_______________________________________________ resin-interest mailing list resin-interest@caucho.com http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest