If I'm an IXP (don't need the prefix to show up in the "global routing
table") and would like a /96 please...
... then I'd have no problem with that statement.
exactly. The draft policy covers a wide range of end-users and as such we need to consider the needs of all of them.

Admitted, not many will want to justify a longer prefix ....

If clarification can be added without blowing or restricting things,
that's of course welcome.


PS: right to use only the new list name now?

I think it's time we all adjusted, me included :-)

resource-policy mailing list

Reply via email to