Hello,
If I'm an IXP (don't need the prefix to show up in the "global routing
table") and would like a /96 please...
... then I'd have no problem with that statement.
exactly. The draft policy covers a wide range of end-users and as
such we need to consider the needs of all of them.
Admitted, not many will want to justify a longer prefix ....
If clarification can be added without blowing or restricting things,
that's of course welcome.
Regards,
Frank
PS: right to use only the new list name now?
I think it's time we all adjusted, me included :-)
-v
_______________________________________________
resource-policy mailing list
resource-policy@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/resource-policy
