To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4730/

New update by mgokhale-arbor
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4730


    I wouldn't say that the limit is a bug, but I can see where your naming 
scheme runs into problems. I think a limit of 255 produces other problems, 
namely the display of names in the New Review Request page and elsewhere.
    _Usually_, repositories in Review Board are named after the actual name of 
the repository on whatever service is being used, with a namespace being used 
to disambiguate (so for instance, `Review Board` and `RBTools` would be 
repository names, but `CI Infrastructure` and `Web Server Infrastructure` might 
be used instead of `ci-team/infrastructure` and `web-team/infrastructure`. It's 
easier to read/consume by users, avoids a lot of wrapping issues that longer 
names provide, and survives the moving of repositories to other groups down the 
road after reorgs.
    I'm not against bumping up the limit, but I wouldn't want to do it in a 
point release, since that impacts many customers of ours who have to be careful 
about when they perform upgrades that impact database schema.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to