Ok :) So question to authors.

How this should looks like?

On Mar 10, 10:26 pm, Dan Savilonis <d...@n-cube.org> wrote:
> I think Clearcase can be used in a way where that type of extended
> path is valid. You should double check if you can open that file path
> directly yourself and perhaps see why it might think that is the
> previous version. I don't really understand the logic used to find
> previous revisions in ClearCaseClient methods, but it appears able to
> generate this kind of path. I also remember the original review for
> this change had screenshots of extended paths and an option to shorten
> then, so he seemed to expect this kind of craziness.
>
> Dan
>
> On Mar 10, 12:33 pm, Jan Koprowski <jan.koprow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi !
>
> >   I'am back to testing reviewboard with clearcase. Now I see that
> > after post-review there is strange revision version path is send:
>
> >  post-review -d index.wsgi --serverhttp://gklab-62-060/>>> svn info
> > >>> git rev-parse --git-dir
> > >>> cleartool pwv -short
> > >>> repository info: Path: /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools, Base 
> > >>> path: /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools, Supports changesets: 
> > >>> False
> > >>> cleartool desc -pre 
> > >>> /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools/scripts/ReleaseRobot/index.wsgi
> > >>> cleartool desc -fmt %Vn /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools
> > >>> cleartool desc -fmt %Vn 
> > >>> /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools/scripts
> > >>> cleartool desc -fmt %Vn 
> > >>> /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools/scripts/ReleaseRobot
> > >>> Looking for 'gklab-62-060 /' cookie in 
> > >>> /user/jkoprows/.post-review-cookies.txt
> > >>> Cookie file loaded, but no cookie for this server
>
> > ==> Review Board Login Required
> > Enter username and password for Review Board athttp://gklab-62-060/
> > Username: admin
> > Password:>>> Logging in with username "admin"
> > >>> HTTP POSTing 
> > >>> tohttp://gklab-62-060/api/json/accounts/login/:{'username': 'admin', 
> > >>> 'password': '**************'}
> > >>> Logged in.
> > >>> Attempting to create review request on 
> > >>> /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools for None
> > >>> HTTP POSTing 
> > >>> tohttp://gklab-62-060/api/json/reviewrequests/new/:{'repository_path': 
> > >>> '/view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools'}
> > >>> Review request created
> > >>> Attempting to set field 'description' to 'reviewboard_scmtools
>
> > VIEWTYPE: dynamic
> > ' for review request '3'>>> HTTP POSTing 
> > tohttp://gklab-62-060/api/json/reviewrequests/3/draft/set/:{'description': 
> > 'reviewboard_scmtools\nVIEWTYPE: dynamic\n'}
> > >>> Uploading diff, size: 436
> > >>> HTTP POSTing 
> > >>> tohttp://gklab-62-060/api/json/reviewrequests/3/diff/new/:{'basedir': 
> > >>> '/view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools'}
> > >>> Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 200): One or more fields had errors
> > >>> Error data: {'fields': {'path': ['cat: 
> > >>> /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools/SCM_tools/@@/main/6/scripts/@@/ma
> > >>>  in/6/ReleaseRobot/@@/main/3/index.wsgi/@@/main/8: No such file or 
> > >>> directory\n']}, 'stat': 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'One or more fields had 
> > >>> errors', 'code': 105}}
>
> > Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (HTTP 200, API
> > Error 105)
> > Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
>
> > part: /view/reviewboard_scmtools/vobs/SCM_tools/SCM_tools/@@/main/6/
> > scripts/@@/main/6/ReleaseRobot/@@/main/3/index.wsgi/@@/main/8 doesn't
> > have any sens. There should be only one version. What was happend?
>
> > I made dynamic view.
> > Checkout file
> > Make changes
> > Run post-review as You see below
>
> > Greetings From Poland!
> > --
> > Jan Koprowski

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to