Thanks Tim. This idea has some merit since it permits small checkins while submitting a story as a finished chunk. This may be an appropriate practice for some of the larger stories that are actively in development anyway.
I'll talk with my team. Cheers, M On Feb 9, 9:17 pm, "Tim" <tim.pi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another option would be to create story branches in SVN then migrate back to > trunk at story completion. This way you can review a story branch using a > range and not be "polluted" with trunk checkins or other branches. > > This would of course be a philosophy shift in your org and we all know how > programmers enjoy change J > > Tim > > From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of Christian Hammond > Sent: February-09-11 2:24 AM > To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: post-review - dis-contiguous revisions > > Hi Martin. > > You can't, really. You will have to have a review request per consecutive > range. It doesn't really make sense otherwise, since we have to literally > apply those changes and then show what happened between the two ends of the > range. Having holes in that range doesn't mean anything useful. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:17 PM, mmacrobert <mmacrob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm trialling Reviewboard for my organisation and my workgroup. I've > successfully used "post-review" to create review-requests on my > reviewboard installation on Win32 and integrating with SVN. > > My team follows a pattern of numerous small checkins for completion of > a story. Even for a small team this leads to dis-contiguous collection > of revision numbers for a given story, so the "--revision-range=" > parameter may be inappropriate for the task. > > How can I use post-review to generate a review-request based upon a > discontiguous collection of review numbers? > > Thanks in advance. > > Martin > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
