Not sure what you mean by not proper? Christian
-- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:11 PM, kvr <kvr....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks ! , that resolved the issue ,but UI is not proper. > > > On Saturday, December 8, 2012 5:19:51 PM UTC+5:30, Vishal Gautam wrote: > >> That worked!!! Installed the latest Djblets 0.7.6 and it worked. >> >> Thank you so much Chris! >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Christian Hammond <chi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> If you upgrade Djblets to what's in Git, this will go away. I'll see >>> about doing another Djblets release tonight, though, to fix it. >>> >>> As soon as we finish docs, 1.7 will be released. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 21:21, Vishal Gautam <gautam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Turned Debug=True, now i see this ... any pointers? >>> >>> Traceback: >>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Django-1.4.2-** >>> py2.6.egg/django/core/**handlers/base.py" in get_response >>> 89. response = middleware_method(request) >>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.** >>> 7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/**admin/middleware.py" in process_request >>> 44. load_site_config() >>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.** >>> 7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/**admin/siteconfig.py" in load_site_config >>> 215. apply_django_settings(**siteconfig, settings_map) >>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-** >>> py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/**django_settings.py" in >>> apply_django_settings >>> 210. setter(settings, setting_key, value) >>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-** >>> py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/**django_settings.py" in _set_cache_backend >>> 48. engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value) >>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Django-1.4.2-** >>> py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__**init__.py" in parse_backend_uri >>> 58. if backend_uri.find(':') == -1: >>> >>> Exception Type: AttributeError at / >>> Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find' >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond <chi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log >>>> you provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else >>>> causing the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log >>>> file? >>>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam <gautam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie), >>>> spent entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated >>>> the site with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be >>>> an issue I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and >>>> recreated the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is >>>> RB 1.7 not compatible with Python 2.6? >>>> >>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-** >>>> packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.**egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.py:26: >>>> DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead >>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] from md5 import md5 >>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-** >>>> packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.**egg/django/views/generic/list_**detail.py:10: >>>> DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use >>>> class-based views instead. >>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] DeprecationWarning >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> First, do you have a backup of the database? >>>>> >>>>> What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For >>>>> example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an >>>>> upgrade? >>>>> >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam <gautam...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the response Chris! >>>>>> >>>>>> I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded >>>>>> setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine >>>>>> (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am >>>>>> stuck at upgrading the site .... and my RB instance is down ... Please >>>>>> help! >>>>>> >>>>>> [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/ >>>>>> reviews.xxx.xxxx.com >>>>>> Rebuilding directory structure >>>>>> Updating database. This may take a while. >>>>>> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-****packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.**e** >>>>>> gg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.**py:26: DeprecationWarning: the md5 >>>>>> module is deprecated; use hashlib instead >>>>>> from md5 import md5 >>>>>> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-****packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-**li** >>>>>> nux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/**num**ber.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: >>>>>> Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp >= 5 to avoid >>>>>> timing attack vulnerability. >>>>>> Creating tables ... >>>>>> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required >>>>>> Installing custom SQL ... >>>>>> Installing indexes ... >>>>>> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) >>>>>> The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. >>>>>> Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes >>>>>> required. >>>>>> >>>>>> The following are the changes that could not be resolved: >>>>>> In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment: >>>>>> Field 'extra_data' has been added >>>>>> In model reviews.ReviewRequest: >>>>>> Field 'last_review_activity_**timestam**p' has been added >>>>>> Field 'last_review_timestamp' has been deleted >>>>>> In model accounts.Profile: >>>>>> Field 'timezone' has been added >>>>>> Field 'open_an_issue' has been added >>>>>> In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory: >>>>>> Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added >>>>>> In model diffviewer.FileDiff: >>>>>> Field 'diff_hash' has been added >>>>>> Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added >>>>>> Field 'diff64' has been added >>>>>> Field 'parent_diff64' has been added >>>>>> Field 'parent_diff' has been deleted >>>>>> Field 'diff' has been deleted >>>>>> The model auth.Message has been deleted >>>>>> Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot >>>>>> resolve automatically. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:36:42 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Review Board 1.7 requires Python 2.5 or higher. You'll have to >>>>>>> upgrade in order for it to work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What I'd recommend is a newer CentOS install, since some of our >>>>>>> dependencies will also need to be updated, and you won't hit as many >>>>>>> issues >>>>>>> with the upgrade. Your best bet is to upgrade to something with Python >>>>>>> 2.7. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >>>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >>>>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Vishal Gautam >>>>>>> <gautam...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are trying out RB, we have 1.6.14 installed and running on >>>>>>>> CentOS 5.5. Tried to upgrade it to 1.7 using following cmd but its >>>>>>>> failing >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> easy_install -f http://downloads.reviewboard.**o**** >>>>>>>> rg/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7<http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7>-U >>>>>>>> ReviewBoard >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here is the stracktrace, any help will be much appreciated >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1 >>>>>>>> Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.**o**** >>>>>>>> rg/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/**Re****viewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz<http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz> >>>>>>>> Processing ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz >>>>>>>> Running ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir >>>>>>>> /tmp/easy_install-vW-lSE/**Revie****wBoard-1.7rc1/egg-dist-**tmp-** >>>>>>>> DrI**1Td >>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>>>>>> File "./contrib/internal/build-**medi****a.py", line 19, in ? >>>>>>>> ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, >>>>>>>> verbosity=2) >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa****ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.* >>>>>>>> *egg/**dja**ngo/core/management/__**init_**_.**py", line 153, in >>>>>>>> call_command >>>>>>>> klass = load_command_class(app_name, name) >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa****ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.* >>>>>>>> *egg/**dja**ngo/core/management/__**init_**_.**py", line 68, in >>>>>>>> load_command_class >>>>>>>> return module.Command() >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa****ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.* >>>>>>>> *egg/**dja**ngo/contrib/**staticfiles/**manage**ment/**commands/** >>>>>>>> collectstatic.**py", line 41, in __init__ >>>>>>>> self.storage = get_storage_class(settings.**STA**** >>>>>>>> TICFILES_STORAGE)() >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa****ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.* >>>>>>>> *egg/**dja**ngo/core/files/storage.**py", line 265, in >>>>>>>> get_storage_class >>>>>>>> raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: >>>>>>>> "%s"' % (module, e)) >>>>>>>> django.core.exceptions.**Imprope****rlyConfigured: Error importing >>>>>>>> storage module pipeline.storage: "cannot import name CachedFilesMixin" >>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>>>>>> File "/usr/bin/easy_install", line 7, in ? >>>>>>>> sys.exit( >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa**** >>>>>>>> ges/setuptools-0.6c12dev_**r8884****6-py2.4.egg/setuptools/** >>>>>>>> command****/easy_install.py", line 1712, in main >>>>>>>> .......... >>>>>>>> snipped >>>>>>>> ........... >>>>>>>> self.distribution.run_command(******command) >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/**distutil****s/dist.py", line 966, >>>>>>>> in run_command >>>>>>>> cmd_obj.run() >>>>>>>> File "setup.py", line 63, in run >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/**distutil****s/cmd.py", line 333, in >>>>>>>> run_command >>>>>>>> self.distribution.run_command(******command) >>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/**distutil****s/dist.py", line 966, >>>>>>>> in run_command >>>>>>>> cmd_obj.run() >>>>>>>> File "setup.py", line 81, in run >>>>>>>> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Friday, November 30, 2012 3:38:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Review Board "Better Late Than Never" 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had >>>>>>>>> hoped to get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances >>>>>>>>> during >>>>>>>>> some production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, >>>>>>>>> it was >>>>>>>>> worth the wait :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension >>>>>>>>> interface changes in this release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> See the news and release notes for more information. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**new******s/2012/11/29/review-board-** >>>>>>>>> 1-7-******rc-1-released/<http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give >>>>>>>>> it a try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many >>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>> made until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> hit. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >>>>>>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
