Internally, review requests now allow custom metadata. I have an in-progress change to add API support for this, so maybe in 1.7.2. I'd like that to land at the same time as the work needed for custom fields in the UI, though.
Christian On Dec 26, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2012-12-26 14:56, Christian Hammond wrote: >> I'm hoping to create a sample extension for this in time, but honestly, >> there's work that still needs to be done for this. The extension support we >> added is intended to be experimental and incomplete, and we'll be adding to >> it over time. I imagine we'll start to make custom fields work well in an >> early 1.7.x, but I don't have a date for you right now, as there are things >> we have to get to before we can do this well. > > Is it possible yet to add fields that can only be read/written via the API? > It's a bummer if we can't see the name of the request branch on the web > interface, but if we can get/set it through the API, I could at least write a > functional 'git rb merge'. > > -- > Matthew > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
