Oops, the issue URL should be https://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard/issues/116
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:15:14 PM UTC+2, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi, > > I am the current maintainer of the Reviewboard integration for Eclipse [1] > . I was notified by several users that the plugin broke with 1.7, due to > date formatting differences [2] . Apparently for 1.6 a formatted date is > '2010-08-28 02:26:18.474' while for 1.7 it is '2010-08-28T02:26:18.474Z' ( > BTW, there is an incorrect format listed at [3] for 1.6 ; that does not > match what 1.6 currently does ). > > While I agree that ISO 8601 is a good, non-ambiguous way of formatting > dates, it does break backwards compatibility with existing clients, and > forces those which need to support both 1.6 and 1.7 to assume ( or accept ) > more than they should. It would be good to have a standard way of > formatting dates across versions. > > Thanks, > > Robert > > [1]: https://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard > [2]: http://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard/issues/issue/11 > [3]: > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/webapi/2.0/resources/review-request/ > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
