Oops, the issue URL should be 
https://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard/issues/116

On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:15:14 PM UTC+2, Robert Munteanu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am the current maintainer of the Reviewboard integration for Eclipse [1] 
> . I was notified by several users that the plugin broke with 1.7, due to 
> date formatting differences [2] . Apparently for 1.6 a formatted date is 
> '2010-08-28 02:26:18.474' while for 1.7 it is '2010-08-28T02:26:18.474Z'  ( 
> BTW, there is an incorrect format listed at [3] for 1.6 ; that does not 
> match what 1.6 currently does ).
>
> While I agree that ISO 8601 is a good, non-ambiguous way of formatting 
> dates, it does break backwards compatibility with existing clients, and 
> forces those which need to support both 1.6 and 1.7 to assume ( or accept ) 
> more than they should. It would be good to have a standard way of 
> formatting dates across versions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
> [1]: https://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard
> [2]: http://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard/issues/issue/11 
> [3]: 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/webapi/2.0/resources/review-request/
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Reply via email to