> Hi Chris,

I was impressed by RB and still looks great for our needs but the 
integration with TortoiseHg is bad. I would say it's not working at all.
What I was hoping to acomplish and hoping to push to the client as the new 
way of ensuring the code quality (by not allowing merges until the review 
is approved) is not possible as long as RB cannot be integrated with 
TortoiseHg (the client is using mercurial).
I believe you have to take control of these integration points to ensure 
commercial success of RB.

I'm looking forward for the 2.0 version and hope that some day I'll be able 
to show our client a tight integration between code review, mercurial and 
CI server.


Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to