Thanks for your reply. We are using CVS version control here.
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 04:30:40 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
> It would help us to provide some advice if you told us what version
> control system you're using. If you're using a traditional system like SVN
> or Perforce, most people like to use git or hg as a frontend to allow them
> to keep separate things separate.
> On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 8:58:03 AM Nitin Agrawal <your...@gmail.com
>> Here is one problem I am facing in handling an incremental review
>> request. Below are the steps:
>> 1) I, as a developer, raised a review request of one of my task-1
>> 2) After raising the review request, I am doing two things. a) Waiting
>> for review comments b) Also continuing my development on task-2. (Just for
>> the information, I have to incorporate those review comments changes which
>> received in 48 hours of raising the review request.)
>> 3) Now suppose, I completed my development of task-2 in 48 hours. Also I
>> have incorporated the changes related to the review comments received in
>> those 48 hours.
>> 4) With all set, now I am planning to raise a review request on same
>> review ID created in step 1.
>> 5) I update the diff (please mind that new "diff" will contain the review
>> comments changes along with new code for task-2).
>> 6) The problem here is, when as a reviewer I am reviewing the "diff", I
>> have a plethora of code which contains the review comments changes along
>> with new development of task-2. But as a reviewer I was expecting:
>> a) A separate review request containing only the review comments
>> b) A separate review request containing only the new development of
>> Therefore it becomes very hard for the reviewer to verify the code and to
>> give "Ship it!".
>> Please mind that as a developer I am not halting my development therefore
>> I can not do back and forth (maintain a local file and upload the changes
>> only related to review comments separately and for task-2 separately) due
>> to time constraints.
>> Is there anything wrong in the process which I am following or it is just
>> not possible inside review board for handle this kind of scenario?
>> Please help me in this regard.
>> Thanks in Advance
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.