Thanks for your reply. We are using CVS version control here. On Thursday, 5 February 2015 04:30:40 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: > > It would help us to provide some advice if you told us what version > control system you're using. If you're using a traditional system like SVN > or Perforce, most people like to use git or hg as a frontend to allow them > to keep separate things separate. > > -David > > On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 8:58:03 AM Nitin Agrawal <your...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Here is one problem I am facing in handling an incremental review >> request. Below are the steps: >> >> 1) I, as a developer, raised a review request of one of my task-1 >> completed. >> 2) After raising the review request, I am doing two things. a) Waiting >> for review comments b) Also continuing my development on task-2. (Just for >> the information, I have to incorporate those review comments changes which >> received in 48 hours of raising the review request.) >> 3) Now suppose, I completed my development of task-2 in 48 hours. Also I >> have incorporated the changes related to the review comments received in >> those 48 hours. >> 4) With all set, now I am planning to raise a review request on same >> review ID created in step 1. >> 5) I update the diff (please mind that new "diff" will contain the review >> comments changes along with new code for task-2). >> 6) The problem here is, when as a reviewer I am reviewing the "diff", I >> have a plethora of code which contains the review comments changes along >> with new development of task-2. But as a reviewer I was expecting: >> a) A separate review request containing only the review comments >> changes. >> b) A separate review request containing only the new development of >> task-2. >> >> Therefore it becomes very hard for the reviewer to verify the code and to >> give "Ship it!". >> >> Please mind that as a developer I am not halting my development therefore >> I can not do back and forth (maintain a local file and upload the changes >> only related to review comments separately and for task-2 separately) due >> to time constraints. >> >> Is there anything wrong in the process which I am following or it is just >> not possible inside review board for handle this kind of scenario? >> >> Please help me in this regard. >> >> Thanks in Advance >> >> -- >> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >> https://rbcommons.com/ >> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >
-- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
