Still the same problem then, I'm afraid. It's very likely that the entrypoints would need to be re-registered. You may have to re-install the Review Board package.
I've alerted Bitnami to the problem. They're going to be taking a look at it, see if they can get new builds out. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:41 PM, dac <damien.col...@gmail.com> wrote: > Christian, > > > "Team Foundation Server" and "Team Foundation Server (git)" are the only > two entries in the "Repository type" drop down list. > > I can no longer see anything obvious in the "D:\ProgramFiles\Bitnami\ > reviewboard-2.5.9-0\apache2\logs\error.log" log file. > > > > > On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 14:24:24 UTC+10, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> Hi Damien, >> >> Can you check for more errors in the logs, and show me a listing of >> everything in the repository type list? >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond >> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:10 PM, dac <damien...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Christian, >>> >>> I have downloaded and installed a new version of pytz, I can now see all >>> the other authentication types available and have event configured AD >>> authentication successfully. However there is still no SVN option available >>> for selection. This is the case on two separate installations. >>> >>> I have a fresh install *without* a custom install of pysvn, and still >>> no luck. While this is may be a Bitnami issue, I would greatly appreciate >>> any thoughts on what to investigate next. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 11:09:29 UTC+10, Christian Hammond wrote: >>>> >>>> That's the problem then. An incompatible pytz is installed. When >>>> there's a version conflict like this, it impacts anything scanned via >>>> Python entrypoints, preventing them from loading. If you can resolve this >>>> by upgrading pytz, the problem will go away. >>>> >>>> It's entirely possible that Bitnami is shipping an older pytz and not a >>>> newer one, as we recently changed the dependencies for this. >>>> >>>> I'll forward this thread on to Bitnami and see if they can address this. >>>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christian Hammond >>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:37 PM, dac <damien...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> One the http://reviewboard.corp/reviewboard/admin/settings/authentic >>>>> ation/ page, I have "Standard Registration" and "Legacy >>>>> Authentication Module" available. >>>>> BTW, I have reviewed the logs and see the following error occurring >>>>> (once again, while I have experience in many other languages, python is >>>>> not >>>>> one of them, so I'm not sure if this is relevant) >>>>> >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] >>>>> ERROR:root:Error loading authentication backend x509: pytz 2014.4 is >>>>> installed but pytz>=2015.2 is required by [] >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] >>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] File >>>>> "D:\\ProgramFiles\\Bitnami\\reviewboard-2.5.9-0\\apps\\revie >>>>> wboard\\htdocs\\Lib\\site-packages\\ReviewBoard-2.5.9- >>>>> py2.7.egg\\reviewboard\\accounts\\backends.py", line 935, in >>>>> _populate_defaults >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] cls >>>>> = entry.load() >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] File >>>>> "build\\bdist.win32\\egg\\pkg_resources.py", line 2182, in load >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] >>>>> self.require(env, installer) >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] File >>>>> "build\\bdist.win32\\egg\\pkg_resources.py", line 2196, in require >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] >>>>> items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer) >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] File >>>>> "build\\bdist.win32\\egg\\pkg_resources.py", line 632, in resolve >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] >>>>> raise VersionConflict(tmpl % args) >>>>> [Wed May 24 09:30:40.181811 2017] [:error] [pid 1272:tid 1016] >>>>> VersionConflict: pytz 2014.4 is installed but pytz>=2015.2 is required by >>>>> [] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 09:48:07 UTC+10, Christian Hammond wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> It's definitely an issue with the installation. The Python >>>>>> entrypoints are likely not registered in the environment, and that's on >>>>>> their end. Entrypoints are a Python feature allowing applications/modules >>>>>> to register entries in a common place that can be looked up by other >>>>>> applications/modules, for extensibility purposes. This will affect the >>>>>> list >>>>>> of repository types (there should be many in there), hosting services, >>>>>> authentication backends, extensions, and more. If these are empty, then >>>>>> the >>>>>> package was either not installed correctly in their environment, or was >>>>>> disrupted in yours somehow. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's verify that's the cause. Can you go into the Authentication >>>>>> Settings and see what types of auth backends there are? >>>>>> >>>>>> Christian >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:38 PM, dac <damien...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Christian, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the response. Unfortunately Bitnami refers to >>>>>>> reviewboard.org for resolution. While the following link is not my >>>>>>> post, it is exactly the issue that I am facing >>>>>>> https://community.bitnami.com/t/how-can-i-select-subversion- >>>>>>> from-repository-type-list/47824 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will add a comment to the Bitnami post to see if there is any >>>>>>> further information forthcoming. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 06:47:02 UTC+10, Christian Hammond wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Bitnami installation should have included everything you need >>>>>>>> for Subversion. It's likely that installing a custom PySVN would have >>>>>>>> resulted in problems. The reason being that on Windows, both Python >>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>> compiled Python modules you use must generally all be compiled using >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> same compiler. This is certainly the case with PySVN. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd suggest uninstalling the Bitnami-provided Review Board and >>>>>>>> ensuring that the directory is completely empty, then re-installing >>>>>>>> Review >>>>>>>> Board, see if PySVN shows up in that case. If not, the Bitnami team >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> have to help you, because this is very environment-dependent on >>>>>>>> Windows. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 7:28 PM, dac <damien...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have successfully installed the Bitnami distribution on a >>>>>>>>> Windows 2012 r2 server, to D:\ProgramFiles\Bitnami\review >>>>>>>>> board-2.5.9-0 >>>>>>>>> I am not a python native, but believe I have done the right thing >>>>>>>>> by installing the py27-pysvn-svn194-1.9.3-1884-Win32.exe to >>>>>>>>> D:\ProgramFiles\Bitnami\reviewboard-2.5.9-0\python\Lib\site- >>>>>>>>> packages\pysvn. >>>>>>>>> The CollabNetSubversion-client-1.9.5-1-Win32.exe distribution has >>>>>>>>> been installed to "D:\ProgramFiles\CollabNet\Subversion Client", >>>>>>>>> and this folder exists on the PATH. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But in the Admin DashBoard ->Add repository->Repository Type, >>>>>>>>> SVN/Subversion is not one of the options. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does anyone know how to have SVN setup for Review Board on a >>>>>>>>> Windows Server? Or how Review Board determines the existence of SVN? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I realise that Review Board is recommended for *NIX environments, >>>>>>>>> but unfortunately I am required to have this deployed in a windows >>>>>>>>> environment, otherwise I will have to find a different product. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Damien. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>>>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>>>>>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>>>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: > https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: > https://rbcommons.com/ > Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
