> On June 25, 2016, 6:29 p.m., Nate Cole wrote:
> > Latest patch still seems like forced solution.  Why not just allow the 
> > alert definition to provide "data" attribute (or whatever) in json that 
> > port_alert can use?
> 
> Masahiro Tanaka wrote:
>     Thanks for reviewing. I've tried to chagne the code as you said, but that 
> requires to change the Ambari metadata DB schema.
>     It seemed exaggerated to me, but the fact is remained that my latest 
> patch isn't a simple solution.
>     
>     Which one do you (or community) prefer? I'll try to follw the idea.

If you change the "source" part of the definition (or use "parameters" object 
in that) then you don't need to change schema.


- Nate


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/#review139457
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 25, 2016, 9:54 a.m., Masahiro Tanaka wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 25, 2016, 9:54 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Florian Barca, Jonathan Hurley, and Nate Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-17253
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17253
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There are too many WARNING in ZooKeeper log.
> ```
> 2016-06-15 21:02:15,405 - WARN  
> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:2181:NIOServerCnxn@357] - caught end of 
> stream exception
> EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client sessionid 
> 0x0, likely client has closed socket
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:228)
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> ```
> 
> It may be because of Ambari Alert. Ambari Alert pings to the zookeeper port 
> to do monitoring.
> We should use 'ruok' to monitor zookeepers.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-agent/conf/unix/ambari-agent.ini 914e09a 
>   ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/AlertSchedulerHandler.py 65cc8b0 
>   ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/alerts/port_alert.py 1918327 
>   ambari-agent/src/test/python/ambari_agent/TestAlertSchedulerHandler.py 
> 1202c81 
>   ambari-agent/src/test/python/ambari_agent/TestPortAlert.py dffa56c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn clean test
> 
> ```
> +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12811835/AMBARI-17253.2.patch
> against trunk revision .
> +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
> +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
> +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
> compiler warnings.
> +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
> release audit warnings.
> +1 core tests. The patch passed unit tests in .
> Test results: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7427//testReport/
> Console output: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7427//console
> This message is automatically generated.
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Masahiro Tanaka
> 
>

Reply via email to