----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57674/#review170155 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Ship It! - Tim Thorpe On March 23, 2017, 8:46 p.m., Di Li wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/57674/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 23, 2017, 8:46 p.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez and Tim Thorpe. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-20461 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20461 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > ------- > > This is an issue specifically for custom stacks that may not have > override_hbase_uid property in hbase-env.xml. In this case, override_uid is > currently set to true by Ambari's auto merge logic. it should be set to false > when upgrading Ambari 2.1 to 2.2 or newer with custom stacks in order to > respect the existing UID customers already set on their clusters. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog212.java > 499c726 > > ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog212Test.java > 3f7bcc8 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57674/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > unit tests. install an Ambari 2.1 cluster with my custom stack where HBase > does not have override_hbase_uid property. build Ambari rpm from trunk code, > run ambari upgrade, verify override_uid is set to false in cluster-env, so > that UIDs that I already set on my cluster are respected. > > > Thanks, > > Di Li > >
