> On May 3, 2017, 5:08 p.m., Robert Levas wrote:
> > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/security/authorization/AmbariPamAuthenticationProvider.java
> > Lines 79 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58968/diff/1/?file=1707168#file1707168line79>
> >
> >     There are other User types - LDAP and JWT.  You should check to see if 
> > any user exists with the username. If the existing user is not a PAM user 
> > the failure should occur.  
> >     
> >     For example:
> >     ```
> >     UserEntitiy foundUser = userDAO.findUserByName(username)'
> >     if((foundUser != null) && (foundUser.getUserType != UserType.PAM)) {
> >     ... Fail ...
> >     }
> >     ```
> 
> Tim Thorpe wrote:
>     Hi Robert, I'm not sure I'm following your logic here.  My interpretation 
> is that the PAM users will not be found using the 
> UserDAO.findLocalUserByName(String userName) method.  So basically the 
> getUserType() != UserType.PAM is unnecessary.  Although it wouldn't hurt.
> 
> Anita Jebaraj wrote:
>     Hi Tim, Robert means that I should look for all user types like 
> (Local/ldap/jwt), I am aware ldap cannot be enabled when pam is enabled, but 
> jwt users can exist when pam is enabled. That should be the reason why he 
> wants me to look for all the users.
> 
> Tim Thorpe wrote:
>     Sorry missed the part where you changed findLocalUserByName to 
> findUserByName.  That makes sense now.

Hi Robert, please review the new patch


- Anita


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58968/#review173752
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 3, 2017, 6:24 p.m., Anita Jebaraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58968/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 3, 2017, 6:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Attila Doroszlai, Di Li, Robert Levas, and Tim 
> Thorpe.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-20909
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20909
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Create a local user "test" in Ambari
> 
> Create a system user "test" with different password
> 
> Trying to authenticate via pam in Ambari UI as user "test" throws Server 
> Error in Ambari UI, without any error in Ambari-server logs
> 
> Also the UI gets stalled and not even able to login as admin user unless the 
> browser cache is removed or Ambari UI is opened in a new browser page
> 
> Ambari doesn't allow creating users with same user name but different 
> types(Local/pam), We reach the pam authentication only when the local user 
> authentication failed due to non-existing userid or incorrect password, So if 
> local user exists do not attempt to authenticate via PAM, This lets Ambari to 
> avoid importing duplicate userid into the database
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/security/authorization/AmbariPamAuthenticationProvider.java
>  b3fb861 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/security/authorization/AmbariPamAuthenticationProviderTest.java
>  b7272c5 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58968/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Updated the related test cases
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anita Jebaraj
> 
>

Reply via email to