> On Sept. 2, 2015, 5:08 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > Ship It! > > Kevin Sweeney wrote: > procedural question - I see there's a long-running 0.9.x branch - should > I merge this to master then merge this into that branch?
More or less, yes - i've been cherry-picking back onto 0.9.x. - Bill ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/#review97573 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Steve Salevan and Bill Farner. > > > Repository: aurora-packaging > > > Description > ------- > > Remove openjdk runtime requirement. > > This addresses one of my +0s. > > > Diffs > ----- > > specs/rpm/aurora.spec a559b42d73a4211891d8c7569ea7ab2a3a6993ae > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Using a clean vagrant environment installed aurora, then installed the oracle > jdk, then uninstalled java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless (that aurora brought in > transitively). RPM didn't complain and when I restarted the scheduler it was > running under the new JVM. > > ``` > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ curl -s http://localhost:8081/vars | grep > 'jvm_prop_java_vendor ' > jvm_prop_java_vendor Oracle Corporation > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ > ``` > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Sweeney > >
