----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45212/#review125020 -----------------------------------------------------------
specs/rpm/aurora.spec (line 100) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45212/#comment187772> Generally this will need to be a range, ie: ``` Requires: mesos >= %{MESOS_MIN_VERSION} Requires: mesos <= %{MESOS_MAX_VERSION} ``` The mesos deprecation policy was raised in this thread: http://markmail.org/message/ykijs5gjtzujxtb4, the upshot being Aurora should be able to depend on the current version of mesos its being built against on master +/- 1. Similarly, the [deb control file](https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/specs/debian/control#L21-L24) should be using something like `mesos (>= 0.24.0), mesos (<= 0.26.0)` or `mesos (>= ${MESOS_MIN_VERSION}), mesos (<= ${MESOS_MAX_VERSION})` in concert with a `substvars` file. I'm going to add a few reviewers for additional opinions - I am probably overthinking this. - John Sirois On March 23, 2016, 6:47 a.m., Pierre Cheynier wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/45212/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 23, 2016, 6:47 a.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora. > > > Repository: aurora-packaging > > > Description > ------- > > We should consider MESOS_VERSION as the minimal requirement to install > the current Aurora version instead of enforce a specific Mesos version. > > > Diffs > ----- > > specs/rpm/aurora.spec 61e7d146108ae7dd5e129d8288a05773c2659d25 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45212/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Install Aurora through the RPM built with aurora-packaging on a Mesos 0.27 > running install. > > > Thanks, > > Pierre Cheynier > >