-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45193/#review125024
-----------------------------------------------------------



I think this change stands on its own aside from the current state of the 
generated Go thrift bindings, but there has been a good deal of discussion 
about those bindings offline.  Some homework below.

For the case of the `TaskQuery` thrift struct, thrift 0.9.3 generates the 
following Go struct:
```go
type TaskQuery struct {
        // unused field # 1
        JobName string `thrift:"jobName,2" json:"jobName"`
        // unused field # 3
        TaskIds  map[string]bool         `thrift:"taskIds,4" json:"taskIds"`
        Statuses map[ScheduleStatus]bool `thrift:"statuses,5" json:"statuses"`
        // unused field # 6
        InstanceIds map[int32]bool `thrift:"instanceIds,7" json:"instanceIds"`
        // unused field # 8
        Environment string           `thrift:"environment,9" json:"environment"`
        SlaveHosts  map[string]bool  `thrift:"slaveHosts,10" json:"slaveHosts"`
        JobKeys     map[*JobKey]bool `thrift:"jobKeys,11" json:"jobKeys"`
        Offset      int32            `thrift:"offset,12" json:"offset"`
        Limit       int32            `thrift:"limit,13" json:"limit"`
        Role        string           `thrift:"role,14" json:"role"`
}
```

This is reasonable since `api.TaskQuery{}.TaskIds == nil` is true; ie the 
collections (maps represent sets here) zero to nil.
The issue comes in the serialization for these fields, `taskIds` is shown below 
as an example:
```go
func (p *TaskQuery) writeField4(oprot thrift.TProtocol) (err error) {
        if err := oprot.WriteFieldBegin("taskIds", thrift.SET, 4); err != nil {
                return thrift.PrependError(fmt.Sprintf("%T write field begin 
error 4:taskIds: ", p), err)
        }
        if err := oprot.WriteSetBegin(thrift.STRING, len(p.TaskIds)); err != 
nil {
                return thrift.PrependError("error writing set begin: ", err)
        }
        for v, _ := range p.TaskIds {
                if err := oprot.WriteString(string(v)); err != nil {
                        return thrift.PrependError(fmt.Sprintf("%T. (0) field 
write error: ", p), err)
                }
        }
        if err := oprot.WriteSetEnd(); err != nil {
                return thrift.PrependError("error writing set end: ", err)
        }
        if err := oprot.WriteFieldEnd(); err != nil {
                return thrift.PrependError(fmt.Sprintf("%T write field end 
error 4:taskIds: ", p), err)
        }
        return err
}
```

So, since its safe to do so in Go (`len(p.TaskIds) == 0` and `for v, _ := range 
p.TaskIds {` loops 0 times for `p.TaskIds == nil`), the code always emits the 
`taskIds` field, whether nil or not, which presents on the other end of the 
wire as an empty set (as opposed to a null or un-set set).  This does seem like 
a clear bug in the thrift compiler.  
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3700 is similar, but on the 
deserialization side of things so I've filed 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3752.

- John Sirois


On March 22, 2016, 8:32 p.m., John Sirois wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45193/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 22, 2016, 8:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David Chung, Bill Farner, and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, `null` was handled differently from an empty collection in
> task queries. For the Go thrift bindings, this was problematic since
> zero values in Go are useful in almost all cases and in particular in the
> case of slices (collections).  In these cases unset `TaskQuery`
> collection parameters are represented as empty collections (empty
> slices[]) instead of `nil` (`null`), leading to the inability to use the
> query API in any natural way.
> 
>  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/JobKeys.java                  
> |  2 +-
>  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/Query.java                    
> |  2 +-
>  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/TaskStore.java             
> |  2 +-
>  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/mem/MemTaskStore.java      
> |  6 ++++--
>  src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/TaskMapper.xml     
> |  6 +++---
>  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/AbstractTaskStoreTest.java 
> | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>  6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/JobKeys.java 
> 8f5bf58b963ae5f76aad7dfa34bae5b9e67d6242 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/Query.java 
> ee01eaa4d0230d6bf0909b6460f27a74f03240db 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/TaskStore.java 
> ac0bb374842741d7ccb7a83c574a90ac156af0f9 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/mem/MemTaskStore.java 
> 231a55615abfbb483667f5f8ef71d2709fc16a88 
>   src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/TaskMapper.xml 
> 684614ffc42dd6778c7675a6c2f81cb72c106c0e 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/AbstractTaskStoreTest.java 
> e56fed2e6c0cdb47737cf1a9b637c44c5e5b9815 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45193/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> NB: This change was broken out of https://reviews.apache.org/r/42756/
> since it stands on its own (although its slightly more awkward in the
> mutable thrift world) and the case of the Go Aurora API client forces the
> issue.
> 
> Locally green:
> ```
> ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh
> ./src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end.sh
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Sirois
> 
>

Reply via email to