-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46803/#review131025
-----------------------------------------------------------



Is there ever a case where we wouldn't want to show the tier? I.e., can someone 
configure the scheduler to *not* use tiers, or are they always on now?

I'm concerned that this is fairly prominent UI placement for a concept that 
will be completely unknown to users. It's hard for me to judge what the best UI 
is to represent tiers when no one's actually using them yet (e.g. will users 
think in terms of tier names, or will they think in terms of the properties 
associated with tiers, in which case, would it make more sense to break it down 
to the level of preemptible and revocable).

I guess for now, given the unknowns this is fine and we can iterate as we get 
feedback from users.

- Joshua Cohen


On April 28, 2016, 11:09 p.m., Amol Deshmukh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46803/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 28, 2016, 11:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> AURORA-1458: Add tier into the UI "show config" summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/configSummary.html 
> 1af7511de0e8a143c8ea88377aad756b44e3ac30 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/js/controllers.js 
> 84417ebeadfae57d55b9f12e8a985825bd620fc8 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/js/services.js 
> d9ce52065f9573b0aa68a95da7da7c50fb14310a 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/schedulingDetail.html 
> eb88c1e6dec7a26643e8b13ffcf8e90df70a67f7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46803/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ensured the changes appear in the UI after launching the scheduler using 
> vagrant.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> Jobs by Role
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/28/7cbec002-e213-4c24-92d9-16b45efb839c__Jobs_by_Role.png
> Per Job Config Summary
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/28/5b785fa7-1053-4b8b-ba0d-438a9170c756__Per_Job_Config_Summary.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amol Deshmukh
> 
>

Reply via email to