-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46803/#review131028
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/js/controllers.js (line 139)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46803/#comment194967>

    I am not too keen on having a column for an optional field that will most 
likely read 'default' for all jobs. Perhaps postpone its introduction until 
TaskConfig.tier is required?


- Maxim Khutornenko


On April 28, 2016, 11:09 p.m., Amol Deshmukh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46803/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 28, 2016, 11:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> AURORA-1458: Add tier into the UI "show config" summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/configSummary.html 
> 1af7511de0e8a143c8ea88377aad756b44e3ac30 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/js/controllers.js 
> 84417ebeadfae57d55b9f12e8a985825bd620fc8 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/js/services.js 
> d9ce52065f9573b0aa68a95da7da7c50fb14310a 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/schedulingDetail.html 
> eb88c1e6dec7a26643e8b13ffcf8e90df70a67f7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46803/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ensured the changes appear in the UI after launching the scheduler using 
> vagrant.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> Jobs by Role
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/28/7cbec002-e213-4c24-92d9-16b45efb839c__Jobs_by_Role.png
> Per Job Config Summary
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/28/5b785fa7-1053-4b8b-ba0d-438a9170c756__Per_Job_Config_Summary.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amol Deshmukh
> 
>

Reply via email to