-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63221/#review188979
-----------------------------------------------------------




ui/src/main/js/pages/Instance.js
Line 34 (original), 38 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63221/#comment265918>

    enzyme allows you to update props, you can most likely test that when you 
update the URL that the mock APIs are called (see apiSpy in the existing tests).



ui/src/main/js/pages/Instance.js
Lines 55 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63221/#comment265917>

    I don't think this is related to the previous check. They should be 
independent if statements.



ui/src/main/js/pages/Instance.js
Lines 56 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63221/#comment265919>

    Note that params is an object. So this is just testing for reference 
equality - this means you could have both false negatives and false positives 
here. You probably want something like the npm module "deep-equal".



ui/src/main/js/pages/Instance.js
Lines 58 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63221/#comment265916>

    Extra initialState to a variable and use it here and in constructor?


- David McLaughlin


On Oct. 23, 2017, 6:01 p.m., Reza Motamedi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63221/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 23, 2017, 6:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Kai Huang.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> reload instance page once a neighbor item is clicked
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ui/src/main/js/pages/Instance.js 4b855457c36e180c0ade629f58e8a03b1273a67a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63221/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Checked in my vagrant and now it works.
> 
> ```
> ? ./gradlew ui:lint
> ? ./gradlew ui:test
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Reza Motamedi
> 
>

Reply via email to