> On July 30, 2014, 1:55 a.m., Jake Farrell wrote: > > +0, I dont really think that this is necessary and will add overhead > > (especially with AURORA-616), thoughts on opening this up on the dev@ list > > to a wider discussion?
+1 to hashing this out in a dev@ discussion. I've had a nervous twitch about traditional maven-style dependencies for a long time, and i'd love to know if i'm just wearing a tinfoil hat :-) - Bill ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review49076 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 29, 2014, 7:14 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 29, 2014, 7:14 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jake Farrell and Bill Farner. > > > Bugs: AURORA-620 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-620 > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central > > > Diffs > ----- > > build.gradle 5919a984ae8d5067f72e6efe50ad590405e779eb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > rm -fr ~/.gradle/caches > ./gradlew build > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Sweeney > >
