reviews  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Review Request 31104: task-executor: TASK_RUNNING after first health check Moses Nakamura
  • Re: Review Request 31104: task-executor: TASK_RUNNING after first health check Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 31104: task-executor: TASK_RUNNING after first health check Moses Nakamura
• Review Request 31101: Native Debian packaging for Aurora Benjamin Staffin
  • Re: Review Request 31101: Native Debian packaging for Aurora Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 31101: Native Debian packaging for Aurora Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 31101: Native Debian packaging for Aurora Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 31101: Native Debian packaging for Aurora Jake Farrell
• Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Craig Wickesser
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Florian Pfeiffer
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Craig Wickesser
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Craig Wickesser
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Craig Wickesser
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Craig Wickesser
  • Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS Kevin Sweeney
• Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 31029: Documenting coordinated updates. Bill Farner
• Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 31022: Fixing aurora beta-update status command. Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 30989: Change aurora commands to use aurora job namespace in tutorial Iain Cambridge
• Review Request 30985: Migrating documentation from v1 commands to v2 Florian Pfeiffer
  • Re: Review Request 30985: Migrating documentation from v1 commands to v2 Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30985: Migrating documentation from v1 commands to v2 Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30985: Migrating documentation from v1 commands to v2 Florian Pfeiffer
  • Re: Review Request 30985: Migrating documentation from v1 commands to v2 Joshua Cohen
• Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30957: Extract ReadOnlyScheduler to its own implementation class Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 30950: Add the option to make a non-hooked API. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30950: Add the option to make a non-hooked API. Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 30950: Add the option to make a non-hooked API. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30950: Add the option to make a non-hooked API. Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 30950: Add the option to make a non-hooked API. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30950: Add the option to make a non-hooked API. David McLaughlin
• Review Request 30942: Displaying blockIfNoPulseAfterMs in the UI Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30942: Displaying blockIfNoPulseAfterMs in the UI Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30942: Displaying blockIfNoPulseAfterMs in the UI David McLaughlin
• Review Request 30915: Increase findbugs heap size. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30915: Increase findbugs heap size. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30915: Increase findbugs heap size. Bill Farner
• Review Request 30913: Adding UPDATE_COORDINATOR role access into pause/resume/abort RPCs Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30913: Adding UPDATE_COORDINATOR role access into pause/resume/abort RPCs Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30913: Adding UPDATE_COORDINATOR role access into pause/resume/abort RPCs Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30913: Adding UPDATE_COORDINATOR role access into pause/resume/abort RPCs David McLaughlin
• Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30888: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 1 of 4: TaskAssigner. Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30891: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Offer filtering. Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30895: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 4 of 4: Benchmarks. Kevin Sweeney
• Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Kevin Sweeney
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30890: Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 2 of 4: Veto groups. Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 30859: Remove thrift checksum verification script and resources. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30859: Remove thrift checksum verification script and resources. Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30859: Remove thrift checksum verification script and resources. Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 30858: Upgrade to checkstyle 6.2. Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30858: Upgrade to checkstyle 6.3 Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30858: Upgrade to checkstyle 6.3 Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30858: Upgrade to checkstyle 6.3 Maxim Khutornenko
• Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 30818: Support separate routes for job controller tabs. Bill Farner
• Review Request 30804: Fixing test coverage in startJobUpdate RPC Maxim Khutornenko
  • Re: Review Request 30804: Fixing test coverage in startJobUpdate RPC Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30804: Fixing test coverage in startJobUpdate RPC Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30804: Fixing test coverage in startJobUpdate RPC Maxim Khutornenko
• Review Request 30752: Fix executor builds. Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30752: Fix executor builds. Joe Smith
• Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Zameer Manji
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Joshua Cohen
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Joe Smith
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 30749: Port GC executor to PathDetector interface Brian Wickman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages