-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24206/#review49466
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!


src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/ActiveLimitedStrategy.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/24206/#comment86534>

    protected?



src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/QueueStrategy.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/24206/#comment86535>

    missing javadoc


- Kevin Sweeney


On Aug. 2, 2014, 10:20 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/24206/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 2, 2014, 10:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-613
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-613
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The JobUpdater will call on an UpdateStrategy to determine how a job update 
> progresses through instances.  This will remain a code island until the 
> surrounding features are filled in.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/ActiveLimitedStrategy.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/BatchStrategy.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/QueueStrategy.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/UpdateStrategy.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/BatchStrategyTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/strategy/QueueStrategyTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24206/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew build -Pq
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to